"Benghazi-gate" Settled?
Tuesday, November 27th, 2012
Today concluded the anticipated meeting between GOP leaders within the Senate and potential aspiring Secretary of State - current UN Ambassador - Susan Rice on the threshold of scrutiny concerning her controversial statements following the Benghazi attack on September 11th of this year.
Tuesday, November 27th, 2012
Today concluded the anticipated meeting between GOP leaders within the Senate and potential aspiring Secretary of State - current UN Ambassador - Susan Rice on the threshold of scrutiny concerning her controversial statements following the Benghazi attack on September 11th of this year.
Senators John McCain of Airzona, Lindsey Graham of South
Carolina, and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire left their meeting with Ms. Rice
and current acting director Michael J. Morell with more questions than
answers. Ms. Rice’s responses to further
questioning today resulted in even further scrutiny.
Mr. McCain was “even more disturbed” at the conclusion of
today’s confrontation, and Mr. Graham’s concerns are “greater today than they
were before.”
Ms. Rice has been portrayed as everything from a
sacrificial lamb to a possible willing accomplice by all entities of the media
monster. However, regardless of the countless characterizations, Ms. Rice is
definitely at the tip of the spear pointed down range at the American people
expecting answers.
Who is holding the spear? Both the White House and the
Intelligence community are prime wielders.
After Tuesday’s meeting, Ms. Rice issued statements
acknowledging her incorrect and misleading comments on several television shows
claiming that the root cause for the coordinated attacks on the US compound and
the CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya was over an anti-Islamic video. Furthermore, she maintains her stance that
the ambiguous comments on the multiple media programs were provided by
enfolding information generated by the intelligence community.
In her statement, Ms. Rice said, “The talking points
provided by the intelligence community, and the initial assessment upon which
they were based, were incorrect in a key respect: there was no protest or
demonstration in Benghazi.”
She continued and said, “While we certainly wish that we
had had perfect information just days after the terrorist attack, as is often
the case, the intelligence assessment has evolved.”
Interestingly, in reports produced by several of the
media giants including an article presented by CNN on November 15th,
2012, needs to be highly considered.
Concluding the initial testimony between lawmakers of the
intelligence committee, members denounce that the unfolding events during the
Benghazi attack were displayed in “real-time” in the President’s Situation
Room. Democrat and Republican members of both the House and Senate received
this information behind closed doors in early November. Some of these members
included: Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, Republican Senator
Dan Coats of Indiana, and Republican Saxby Chambliss of Georgia.
Legislators were given the first hand glimpse of the
horrifying events which displayed exactly what happened on September 11th
in Benghazi, Libya. The “real-time” film
began before the attack erupted “through the incident and the exodus,” said
Feinstein. According to one source, the
video exhibited moments in which Ambassador Stevens being dragged out of the
building.
Moreover, to highlight Ms. Rice’s comment, “While we
certainly wish that we had had perfect information just days after the terrorist attack,” opens new doors worth
venturing. It appears that lawmakers are
willing and prepared to take the next approach.
After Tuesday’s meeting with Ms. Rice, Sen. Graham said, “The bottom
line is that I’m more disturbed than I was before…about how four Americans died
in Benghazi, Libya.”
McCain told reporters, “It is clear the information she
gave the American people was incorrect when she said that it was a spontaneous
demonstration triggered by a hateful video. It was not, and there was
compelling evidence at the time that that was certainly not the case.”
Ultimately, speculation regarding a possible cover-up,
and it appears (despite President Obama’s full endorsement) Ms. Rice’s
nomination to fill current Secretary of State Clinton’s role next year will not
be a seamless step in. Critics of Ms.
Rice may obstruct this transition as Sen. Kelly Ayotte told reporters,
“Absolutely, there will be a hold. My
view is we should hold on this until we get sufficient information.”
No comments:
Post a Comment